PDA

View Full Version : what do nobel prize winners know, anyway?


Cedwyn
02-13-2003, 11:02 AM
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2747153.stm

tallcan
02-13-2003, 11:21 AM
anyone else see that chump on the daily show make fun of all those nobel laureates.

people are such schmucks.

StarPhox
02-13-2003, 11:29 AM
I'm not sure if the previous post was sarcasm or not...

Either way, a freshman in high school could spot flaws in Bush's economic practices...at least they could see they're intended to help the wealthy.

So what else is new?

D-d0g
02-13-2003, 11:43 AM
Dude, Karl Rove knows WAY more about all that economic stuff than all those "Nobel Laureate" types, anyway!

All that is just book learning, you know? Down in Texas, they have "down-home 'enmoix" and THAT is what Ameeeri'chuh really needs today.

Make the wealthy wealthier and they'll donate more to republicans, err, I meant to say "and we'll all live happily ever after" (or at least the super waelthy recipients of government largesse will).

Peace,

D-d0g

Justin
02-13-2003, 12:02 PM
The administration is full of some very smart people who know full well what they're doing. The fact that their "economic stimulus" plan will not help the economy doesn't mean they're dumb, it just means they're dishonest in calling it a stimulus plan. Massive, permanent tax cuts for the wealthy have been a republican issue for over two decades. The bad economy is just another excuse to impliment them (just as a percieved good economy was another excuse to implement them in 2000.)

tallcan
02-13-2003, 12:04 PM
Originally posted by Doc Mahem
The administration is full of some very smart people who know full well what they're doing. The fact that their "economic stimulus" plan will not help the economy doesn't mean they're dumb, it just means they're dishonest in calling it a stimulus plan. Massive, permanent tax cuts for the wealthy have been a republican issue for over two decades. The bad economy is just another excuse to impliment them (just as a percieved good economy was another excuse to implement them in 2000.)

more or less.